System of Rice Intensification (SRI)

SRI is worth deep consideration for any agro-based economic development because it represents an agroecological strategy that enhances food production and contributes to food security while at the same time improving the natural resource base on which agriculture and other human activities, as well as life itself, depend – the rhizosphere, biosphere and atmosphere.


With SRI methods, farmers have seen that ‘less can produce more’ if biological processes are understood and capitalized upon: (1) Smaller, younger rice seedlings become larger, more productive mature plants when combined with other SRI practices; (2) Fewer rice plants per hill and per m2 give higher yield when used with other SRI practices; (3) Half as much water can produce more rice because aerobic soil conditions are more supportive of root health and plant growth than are anaerobic (hypoxic) conditions; and (4) Greater output is possible with fewer or no chemical inputs because these increase plants' susceptibility to pests and diseases.

Victor Lee interviews Prof. Norman Uphoff in Hanoi after the 2010 International Rice Conference
Click for History of SRI
In 1994, Tefy Saina began working with the Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development (CIIFAD) based in Ithaca, NY, to help farmers living in the peripheral zone around Ranomafana National Park to find alternatives to their slash-and-burn agriculture. So long as paddy yields even with irrigation averaged only 2 tons/hectare, rural households would need to continue growing upland rice and reducing Madagascar's  precious but endangered rain forest ecosystems. These could not last long unless paddy yields were raised on the limited irrigated lowland area. Farmers using SRI methods could averaged 8 tons/hectare after these methods were introduced around Ranomafana. A French project for improving small-scale irrigation systems on the high plateau during this same time period also found that farmers using SRI methods averaged over 8 tons/hectare, compared to 2.5 tons/ha with traditional methods and 3.7 tons/ha with improved methods using fertilizer. A separate evaluation commissioned by the French aid agency (Bilger, 1997) also confirmed average SRI yields of 9 tons/ha.

The name "Tefy Saina" means, in Malagasy, "to improve the mind," indicating that this organization was not concerned just with rice, but also with helping people to change and enrich their thinking. Before he died in June, 1995, Fr. de Laulanié published one article on SRI in the journal Tropicultura (13:1, 1993, Brussels). An English translation of a longer technical paper by Laulanié is available from this website.

Since 1997, a number of other papers or articles have been written about SRI. While most interest came initially from NGO and university circles, evaluations are now coming also from national research programs and international research institutes. More information (in French) about Fr. de Laulanié is available on the Tefy Saina website (Henri de Laulanie, le Visionnaire Realiste) and from an obituary in Jesuites en Mission - Chine Madure Madagascar (No. 255, Dec 1995-Jan1996).

In 1994, Tefy Saina began working with the Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development (CIIFAD) based in Ithaca, NY, to help farmers living in the peripheral zone around Ranomafana National Park to find alternatives to their slash-and-burn agriculture. So long as paddy yields even with irrigation averaged only 2 tons/hectare, rural households would need to continue growing upland rice and reducing Madagascar's  precious but endangered rain forest ecosystems. These could not last long unless paddy yields were raised on the limited irrigated lowland area. Farmers using SRI methods could averaged 8 tons/hectare after these methods were introduced around Ranomafana. A French project for improving small-scale irrigation systems on the high plateau during this same time period also found that farmers using SRI methods averaged over 8 tons/hectare, compared to 2.5 tons/ha with traditional methods and 3.7 tons/ha with improved methods using fertilizer. A separate evaluation commissioned by the French aid agency (Bilger, 1997) also confirmed average SRI yields of 9 tons/ha.

The name "Tefy Saina" means, in Malagasy, "to improve the mind," indicating that this organization was not concerned just with rice, but also with helping people to change and enrich their thinking. Before he died in June, 1995, Fr. de Laulanié published one article on SRI in the journal Tropicultura (13:1, 1993, Brussels). An English translation of a longer technical paper by Laulanié is available from this website.

Since 1997, a number of other papers or articles have been written about SRI. While most interest came initially from NGO and university circles, evaluations are now coming also from national research programs and international research institutes. More information (in French) about Fr. de Laulanié is available on the Tefy Saina website (Henri de Laulanie, le Visionnaire Realiste) and from an obituary in Jesuites en Mission - Chine Madure Madagascar (No. 255, Dec 1995-Jan1996).

Prof. Norman Uphoff, Opening Plenary Debate, International Rice Conference, Hanoi 2010, SRI as Agroecological Solution
Video of Jim Carrey speaking at the Clinton Global Initiative on Sept. 23, 2010.

Go to Jim Carrey's Better U Foundation website, to learn about how lives are changed because of SRI worldwide  
Click image for SRI videos

All of the major rice-producing countries in Asia have begun working with these alternative methods for managing plants, soil, water and nutrients to get higher yields (50-100%), saving water (25%-50%), saving seed (80-90%), and even labor (as much as 10%).   


The China National Rice Research Institute in Hangzhou began evaluating SRI. Since extension of SRI had begun in 2004 by the Sichuan Provincial Department of Agriculture (PDA), with 1,120 ha, the PDA reports that 657,000 ha have been cultivated in the province with an average yield increase of 1.64 t/ha, which has added 1.04 million tons of paddy to Sichuan farmers’ production, with less cost and less water. The Zhejiang PDA has recorded 688,000 hectares of paddy land cultivated with SRI methods since 2005. The average yield increment of 1.25 t/ha that the PDA has calculated has added 862,000 tons to the province’s production, all with a reduction in costs and water as in Sichuan.


In specific agronomic terms, SRI farmers report the following advantages accompanying higher yield and profitability: (1) Drought resistance; (2) Resistance to lodging; (3) Reduced time to maturity; (4) Resistance to pests and diseases (which can probably be explained by the theory of trophobiosis proposed by Francis Chaboussou in 2004; (5) Conservation of rice biodiversity. Perhaps the most interesting development with SRI is the extrapolations that farmers have been making of its concepts and methods to other crops besides irrigated rice, e.g., upland (rainfed) rice in the Philippines; finger millet (ragi) and sugar cane in India; and winter wheat in Poland.

Sustainable Rhizosphere Improvements & Innovations (SRI2)


The rhizosphere (root zone) is our next frontier. Improving the rhizosphere will produce healthier, pest-resistant crops, higher yields (organic food gets better price as well), furthermore saves water and mitigates greenhouse gasses that contributes to global warming.

AgroEcologic provides tools and skills to navigate through the multifunctional aspects of industries and manage the complexities to achieve profitable sustainability.
The ‘Green Revolution’ as the 'quick fix' of modern agriculture for the past few decades was premised on two main strategies: (a) Changing the genetic potentials of plants and animals, and (b) Increasing the use of external inputs - water, chemical fertilizer, insecticides, etc. But it has not adequately addressed the long-term effects of these huge agrochemical and water inputs on the environment.

A more 'ever-green' revolution is found in agroecological management that aims in particular to: (a) Promote the growth and functioning of root systems, which are the interface between plants and their soil environment, and (b) Increase the abundance, diversity and activity of soil organisms, which provide many benefits and services to plants. Having well-developed root systems and active soil biota can reduce water requirements and the costs of production, among other benefits.

Training in the skills for innovating Sustainable Rhizosphere Improvements, including System of Rice Intensification methodology that increases rice yield (as well as other cash crops), reduce water usage, reduce costs, planting in a wide range of terrains, and earn better price for farmers.

This farming methodology reduces atmospheric release of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). CO2 release is reduced by not burning and by locking carbon in the soil with zero-till technology. By not flooding paddy fields, root decomposition and CH4 is reduced. By using organic fertilizer, composting and friendly microorganism, release of N2O gas is also reduced.